Filters

Problem Management Plus (PM+)

**Summary description:** Problem Management Plus (PM+) is a brief five-session WHO intervention for adults from communities exposed to adversities suffering from psychological distress (e.g. anxiety and depression symptoms). The intervention has been successfully delivered by non-specialists in low, middle income and high income countries. **Access to the intervention manual: **Full open access **Access to training:** Will be open access, but for now contact WHO at [psych_interventions@who.int](psych_interventions@who.int) **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider **Therapeutic strategies:** Problem management, behavioural activation, stress reduction and strengthening social support. **Intervention format:** In PM+, people are seen on an individual basis for five weekly sessions (usually face-to-face, but remote versions have also been implemented). Sessions are 90 minutes long with independent practice of strategies between sessions encouraged. There is also an evidence-based group version called Group Management Plus (Group PM+). **Target population:** Adults impaired by psychological distress **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, functional impairment, post-traumatic stress, self-identified problems. While some small effects on PTSD symptoms were found, these varied between studies. This is not a trauma focused intervention and other more relevant interventions exist for PTSD. **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** PM+ is open access and available in many languages, this means it can be adapted for different settings. The intervention has been implemented in a number of settings. **Summary of Evidence:** Several fully powered RCTs have been conducted with PM+ It has been found to be effective in reducing psychological distress and self-identified problems and increasing functioning in women exposed to gender-based violence in Kenya; decreases in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, improvements in functional impairment, self-identified problems, in communities exposed to adversities in Pakistan being implemented by both non professionals and professionals. With Syrian refugees in the Netherlands is has shown to reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD and self-identified problems. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Communities exposed to adversities; Refugees and asylum seekers in middle and high income settings; People with medical conditions; Women exposed to GBV, health workers in HIC. **Restrictions or requirements for its use:** PM+ is not suitable for people who have a severe impairment related to a mental, neurological or substance use disorder, or are at imminent risk of suicide (e.g. people with a plan to end their life in the near future). **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** Ideally this should be a mental health professional thoroughly trained in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). See the PM+ manual for more information. **Examples of adaptations and different formats:** PM+ has been tested effectively as part of a stepped care package for health workers in Spain and was delivered remotely. **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** PM+ is implemented in many different settings. For example, after a capacity building project by TdH and WHO, PM+ was implemented in Ethiopia, Syria and Honduras (see three case studies). Partners in Health have been adapting and implementing PM+ in Rwanda,Peru, Mexico and Malawi (For more information click [here](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503941/pdf/nihms-1745255.pdf)). Information provided by Edith van ‘t Hof on 27 March 2024. She was involved in manual development at WHO.

Author: World Health Organization

7 documents21 translations

Step-by-Step

**Summary description:** Step-by-Step (SbS) is a 5 session intervention proven to improve symptoms of common mental disorders, subjective well-being and self-identified personal problems. It can be offered alongside other mental health interventions, or community programming. SbS can be delivered remotely and at scale and can reach many people across a large geographical area. **Access to the intervention manual:** Contact WHO at Psych_interventions@who.int **Access to training:** Contact WHO at Psych_interventions@who.int **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider **Therapeutic strategies:** SbS provides psychoeducation and training in behavioural activation alongside other therapeutic techniques such as slow breathing, identifying strengths, positive self-talk, increasing social support and relapse prevention. **Intervention format:** SbS was tested in a digital format. It uses a fictional illustrated story of people seeking help for depression, with a trusted character (e.g. a health worker) giving instructions on therapeutic techniques. By reading the story the user of the programme learns the techniques. It encourages service users to practise techniques on their own, in between modules. In the RCTs is was provided as a guided intervention, with five weekly calls of 15 minutes per week. It can also be delivered as an unguided intervention: this might make the intervention less effective, but it will reach more people. **Target population:** Adults with moderate to severe depressive symptoms **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, dysfunctioning, post-traumatic stress, self-identified problems. While some small effects on PTSD symptoms were found, these varied between studies. This is not a trauma focused intervention and other more relevant interventions exist for PTSD. **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** SbS content will be available from WHO as open access and can be added to any online platform (e.g. an e-learning platform). It could also be used in other media formats such as books or videos. It follows a narrative approach, which will make it possible to tailor it for many different populations. In the RCTs is was given as a guided intervention, with five weekly calls of 15 minutes per week. It can also be delivered as an unguided intervention: this might make the intervention less effective, but it will be able to reach more people. **Summary of Evidence:** SbS has been tested through two large randomized controlled trials in Lebanon. The trials showed the intervention was effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety and improving functioning and well-being, including at three-month follow-up. The trials also showed this intervention could be delivered safely, with procedures developed to ensure support to people at imminent risk of suicide. A randomized controlled trial with an adapted version of SbS with Chinese students showed it is effective in reducing depressive symptoms in the short term and improving psychological well-being in a longer term. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Communities exposed to adversities; Refugees and asylum seekers in middle and high income settings; LMICC; student populations **Restrictions or requirements for its use:** SbS is not suitable for people who have a severe impairment related to a mental, neurological or substance use disorder, or are at imminent risk of suicide (e.g. people with a plan to end their life in the near future) Supervisors and trainers are ideally mental health professionals who are competent and experienced in delivering psychological interventions or guided self-help. See the SbS manual (available on request from WHO) for more information. **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** Ideally this should be a mental health professional thoroughly trained in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). See the PM+ manual for more information. **Examples of adaptations and different formats:** Supervisors and trainers are ideally mental health professionals who are competent and experienced in delivering psychological interventions or guided self-help. See the SbS manual (available on request from WHO) for more information. **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** Adapted SbS was also proven to be an acceptable intervention for Filipino overseas workers in China. Other versions of SbS are being piloted, such as a version dedlviered by What’s App in India. After the two RCTs, Step-by-Step was scaled up as a national service in Lebanon and made available to anyone in the country. A process evaluation interviewing key stakeholders and people who completed the programme said it was relevant, acceptable and beneficial. Information provided by Edith van ‘t Hof on 29 March 2024. She was involved in manual development at WHO.

Author: World Health Organization

NETfacts

**Summary description:** NETfacts is an intervention that integrates NET/FORNET indiviudal treatment with a community based intervention that involves all community members. **Access to the intervention manual:** Contact the NET Institute https://www.net-institute.org/ **Access to training:** Contact the NET Institute https://www.net-institute.org/ **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider **Therapeutic strategies:** Cotextualisation of the trauma memory, meaning making, collective memory **Intervention format:** NETfacts is a 5-6 session community intervention using culturally inherent communication methods to feed back composite narratives (anonymised and merged descriptions about the individual experience of a traumatic event) derived from indiviudal NET and FORNET sessions **Target population:** Traumatised communities **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** Reduction of rape myth acceptance, reduction of victimization and perpetration (via rape myths) (alongside reduction of trauma related mental health problem addressed with NET/FORNET). **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** Integration of direct intervention with community members based on composite narratives from NET/FORNET indiviudal treatments **Summary of Evidence:** Find it [here](https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2204698119). **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Rraumatised communities in DR Congo **Restrictions or requirements for its use:** The intervention was tested in adults 16+ yrs. **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** n.a. (status mid 2024) **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** n.a. (status mid 2024) Information provided by Anke Köbach on 21 August 2024. She is co-author if the intervention.

Author: Anke Koebach, Katy Robjant, Sabine Schmitt, Thomas Elbert, Samuel Carleial, Anke Hoeffler, Amani Chibashimba, Harald Hinkel, Maggie Schauer and Frank Neuner

3 documents

Narrative Exposure Therapy for Forensic Offender Rehabilitation (FORNET)

**Summary description:** FORNET follows the principles of NET but incorporates the narration of perpetrated violent acts (symbolised as sticks on the lifeline). Parallel group sessions support the clients to abstain from violence and build new bonds based on pro-social rules. **Access to the intervention manual:** Contact the NET Institute https://www.net-institute.org/ **Access to training:** Contact the NET Institute https://www.net-institute.org/ **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider **Therapeutic strategies:** Contextualisation of the trauma memory, meaning making, social support (buddy), role plays to abstain from violence **Intervention format:** 6 individual and 6 group sessions each 90 min **Target population:** Traumtized individuals who have been actively involved in violence (as perpetrators) **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** Reduction of PTSD, apptetitive aggression, current violent behavior, substance dependence, increase in social acknowledgement **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** In FORNET, excess violence perpetration is treated in the same logic as traumatic event. Groups sessions apply CBT techniques from addiction treatment. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Traumatized offenders in post-conflict and LMIC settings, refugees in high income settings, other **Restrictions or requirements for its use:** Co-morbid psychotic disorders, other severe neurological disease **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** Being able to read and write, excellent communication skills, strong empathic skills **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** FORNET is used in all sorts of clinical practice for instance as a module for forensic or trauma rehabilitation centers with clients who suffer from PTSD and other mental disorders, or in specialized clinics for refugees with trauma related symptoms Information provided by Anke Köbach on 14 June 2024. She is author/developer of the intervention.

Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) System of Care

**Summary description:** CETA is an evidenced based, transdiagnostic system of care based on cognitive behavioral therapy that provides a) a multi-problem assessment, b) a triage system, c) safety planning/suicide prevention, d) flexible treatment options from wellness and prevention through moderate and severe mental and behavioral health conditions, e) option for M&E, measurement-based care results. CETA has proven to be effective in reducing mental health problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, etc.), intimate partner violence, and substance misuse. **Access to the intervention manual:** The manual is sent out when there is interest for review and feedback. Groups who sign up for training get it prior to training for printing, and then have access to ongong manuals. **Access to training:** The manual is sent out when there is interest for review and feedback. Groups who sign up for training get it prior to training for printing, and then have access to ongong manuals. **Intended users/ Implementers:** Non-specialist providers refers to lay-workers, MHPSS practitioners etc. please specify any other groups; We also train MH professionals, volunteers, PCPs, nurses…etc. We have criteria that lay out who might work best in different systems. **Therapeutic strategies:** Engagement and psychoeducation, cognitive coping and restructuring, behavioral activation, confronting fears and trauma memories (gradual exposure), harm reduction strategies and motivational interviewing techniques, problem solving, anxiety management, and caregiver skills. **Intervention format:** For CETA, a) the assessment can be done in person, via tele-health, in groups or individual, via technology...etc. b) people are seen individually and/or in groups for 1-12 sessions on a weekly (or bi-weekly) basis either in-person or remotely depending on their level of need (i.e, precision-based care). Sessions last for 20-60+ minutes and include a weekly client monitoring form to assess changes in mental and behavioral health symptoms. Practice of skills in between sessions is strongly encouraged. CETA Psychosocial Support (CPSS) program is a shorter intervention adapted from CETA and can be delivered individually or in groups for mild symptoms, secondary prevention, screening and referrals. If someone needs full MH treatment (moderate to severe MH issues), the average number of sessions is 8. **Target population:** Adults and children with mild to severe mental and behavioral health conditions **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** The CETA intervention has shown significant outcomes in depression, anxiety, functional impairment, suicide/safety, PTS, substance use and violence. Our assessment has gone through validation in numerous countries and found to be able to effectively replace large batteries. **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** CETA is a flexible transdiagnostic approach that spans the life course and can be adapted and integrated within different settings, including health systems, schools, community day settings, shelters, and virtually. It is unique in that it is the only end-to-end system of care that is evidence-based. CETA is also unique in its address of so many different mental/behavioral health problems. **Summary of Evidence:** Several clinical RCTs have been conducted with CETA and found effective in reducing depression, PTS, impaired functioning, anxiety, substance use, IPV, and aggression.Trials have been done in: a) Mae Sot, Thailand with adult Burmese refugees showing decreased PTS, depression, and dysfunction, b) In Iraq with adults exposed to systematic violence showing reduced PTSD, c) Zambia - adults (couples) along with one child in the house; outcomes focused on substance use and IPV, also showed reduction in depression, PTS, anxiety,etc. d) Zambia adults affected by HIV and alcohol, e) Zambia with AYA reduction of broad internalizing and externalizing symptoms, f) Ukraine - veterans and IDP for full CETA, g) Ukraine - CPSS (psychosocial treatment for veterans and IDPs), h) border of Ethiopia and Somali with children in refugee camp showing reduced internalizing, externalizing, and posttraumatic stress symptoms and improved well-being. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Populations exposed to violent traumatic events, refugees and displaced adults, men and women with interpersonal violence and using substances, health workers, people living with HIV/Diabetes/TF and other physical health issues, perinatal women and their family members, and communities in LMIC and HIC settings. **Restrictions or requirements for its use:** Given that CETA addresses things like suicide and PTSD, we require proper training by a CETA trainer, and ongoing supervision/support to competency to assure safety to all those poulations that are recipients. **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** Supervisors are certified at the provider level first, while at the same time being coached to supervise. They need to demonstrate appropriate supervisory skills and are certified. CETA trainers need to be certified as both a provider and supervisor, and then are selected to go through a train-the-trainer program. At this point they know the CETA system of care, and can coach in small groups....the TTT focuses on how do you train in a larger group, and a lot of implementation science and training management (how to decide/review trainees, consultation with groups on implementation, training logistics, scheduling of element-training, setting up supervision groups, how to teach others to provide and supervise CETA, how to interpret the assessment, etc.) We are flexible on this. At a bare minimum for supervisors, they have to demonstrate the ability to provide CETA well and with fidelity, as well as show leadership and teaching abilities that supervisors need. For trainers, they need to be certified as a provider and supervisor - and demonstrate an ability to speak and lead a large group, teach differnet levels and types of trainees, think flexibly about how to schedule training of different elements, read an audience, organizational skills...etc. Then they need to do a Train-the-trainer, and complete 1-2 co-trainings witha certified CETA trainers. **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** CETA has been adapted and implemented in many countries including, Brazil, Chile, Germany, India, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mexico, Moldova,Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Papua New Guniea, Peru, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Syria, Thailand, United States, Uganda, Ukraine, Zambia. Information provided by Laura Murray on 14 June 2024. She is the author/developer.

Author: JHU Johns Hopkins Bloombert School of Public Health/CETA Global

The Friendship Bench Model

**Summary description:** The Friendship Bench model employs a unique approach to address mental health challenges. It consists of sessions of culturally adapted problem soliving therapy for common mental health disorders delivered by a trained lay counsellor on a bench in a discreet area. Following this one-on-one structured talk therapy, clients are introduced to a peer-led support group called Circle Kubatana Tose (CKT), which translates to ‘holding hands together.’ In these groups, individuals connect with others who have also sat on the Friendship Bench, received PST, and gained empowerment to solve their own problems. The safe space for open dialogue fosters a sense of belonging and reduces stigma associated with mental health issues and personal sharing. **Access to the intervention manual:** Contact Dixon Chibanda at dixon.chibanda@friendshipbench.io **Access to training:** Contact Dixon Chibanda/Ethel Manda at dixon.chibanda@friendshipbench.io/ ethel.manda@friendshipbench.io **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider **Therapeutic strategies:** Problem solving, behaviour activation, social connectedness **Intervention format:** The Friendship Bench intervention comprised 6 sessions of individual problem-solving therapy delivered by trained, supervised LHWs plus an optional 6-session peer support program. The control group received standard care plus information, education, and support on common mental disorders. **Target population:** Adults (18+) with common mental health disorders **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** Among 573 randomized patients (286 in the intervention group and 287 in the control group), 495 (86.4%)were women, median age was 33 years (interquartile range, 27-41 years), 238 (41.7%) were human immunodeficiency virus positive, and 521 (90.9%) completed follow-up at 6 months. Intervention group participants had fewer symptoms than control group participants on the SSQ-14 (3.81; 95% CI, 3.28 to 4.34 vs 8.90; 95% CI, 8.33 to 9.47; adjusted mean difference, −4.86; 95% CI, −5.63 to −4.10; P < .001; adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.29; P < .001). Intervention group participants also had lower risk of symptoms of depression (13.7%vs 49.9%; ARR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.34; P < .001). **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** With over 100 peer-reviewed scientific publications and over 10 years of research, the Friendship Bench stands out as a home grown solution from the Global South to address the treatment gap for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. Our seminal publication of the randomized controlled trial (RCT), in JAMA in 2016 demonstrated an 80% reduction in depression and suicidal ideation and a 60% improvement in quality of life, 6 months after receiving therapy from a trained community grandmother, affectionately referred to as ambuya utano. It is against this publication and numerous others that Friendship Bench has become the most sought-after intervention aimed at addressing the treatment gap for common mental disorders - invited regionally, in the USA, UK, South America and beyond to replicate the model in new settings. We are on a mission to get people out of depression and we envision a friendship bench within a walking distance for all. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Adults 18+ **Examples of adaptations and different formats:** In Zimbabwe - Adolescents and young adults (15-24years) Youth Friendship Bench (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01612840.2021.1924323 and https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01612840.2021.1879977), Adults 18+ living positively with HIV (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001492) and online sessions (https://s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/assets.jmir.org/assets/preprints/preprint-37968-submitted.pdf). Outside Zimbabwe - Mobile application in Kenya (https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/BA0F3D4B9ABA077EEFF634A9D951CBD8/S2054425121000030a.pdf/div-class-title-a-community-health-volunteer-delivered-problem-solving-therapy-mobile-application-based-on-the-friendship-bench-inuka-coaching-in-kenya-a-pilot-cohort-study-div.pdf), Adaptation of a Problem-solving Program (Friendship Bench) to Treat Common Mental Disorders Among People Living With HIV and AIDS and on Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Vietnam (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35802402). In Africa - Malawi, Zambia and Zanzibar. Adaptation in USA - Washington DC (Help Age) and New Orleans. Adaptation in UK - South of London - LSTMH. Information provided by Dixon Chibanda on 19 August 2024. He is the autor.

Author: Dixon Chibanda

2 documents

Social Emotional and Economic Empowerment Knowlege Through Group Support Psychotherapy (SEEK-GSP)

**Summary description:** The SEEK-GSP (Social, Emotional, and Economic Empowerment Knowledge through Group Support Psychotherapy) program trains lay health workers to recognize and treat mild to moderate depression using Group Support Psychotherapy (GSP). This innovative intervention addresses mild to moderate depression by enhancing emotional and social support, positive coping skills, and income-generating abilities. A key advantage of GSP is its reliance on trained primary health care workers, rather than expert mental health practitioners. These workers train lay health workers to identify and treat depression in rural villages, empowering communities to manage their own mental health needs effectively and sustainably. **Access to the intervention manual:** Contact Etheldreda Nakimuli Mpungu ([www.seek-gsp.org/](www.seek-gsp.org/)). Manual can be purchased on Amazon. **Access to training:** Contact Etheldreda Nakimuli Mpungu ([www.seek-gsp.org/](www.seek-gsp.org/)) **Intended users/ Implementers:** Trained and supervised non-specialist provider. **Intervention format:** SEEKGSP is a structured therapeutic intervention designed to improve mental health outcomes among individuals living with chronic conditions, such as HIV/AIDS. The program consists of eight weekly sessions, each lasting 2 to 3 hours, conducted in sex-specific groups of 10 to 12 participants. Trained lay health workers of the same sex as the participants deliver the intervention using a scripted manual to ensure consistency and effectiveness. **Target population:** Children, men, women and youth with mild to moderate depression **Significant effects found on symptoms of:** GSP treats mild to moderate depression, improves functioning, self-esteem and social support. GSP reduces,stigma and increases participation in income generating activities. GSP significantly reduces hazardous alcohol consumption, and suicide risk. **Key innovative or differentiating features of this intervention:** Highly effective against mild to moderate depression. 99% of GSP participants had achieved remission by 6 months after the end of treatment and remained depression there after for 18 months. Two years after treatment, GSP participants monthly income was double the monthly income of Control Group participants. GSP is highly cost-effective. Only 13 USD is needed to prevent one year of disability-adjusted life year(DALY) due to depression. GSP improved HIV viral suppression among HIV positive individuals through the sequential reduction of depression and improvement in ART adherence. **Different populations where the intervention has been used:** Men women children and youth. **Requirements / qualifications for trainers and supervisors:** Trainers are mental health specialists who have received GSP training and have successfully delivered two GSP treatment cycles and are subscibed to SEEKGSP. **Examples of adaptations and different formats:** We have a child and adolescent format and and an online format for Youth(tele-support psychotherapy). **Examples of implementation outside of RCT contexts:** Nigeria Jalingo (Taraba state): Trained 35 health workers (in-person training) 40 (online). Cameroon: Trained 20 healthworkers (Online). Zambia: 20 health workers(online). Ghana 20 healthwokers (online). These healthworkers have created mental health awareness in communities and provided GSP with virtual mentorship and supervision through SEEKGSP Academy. We do not do ME in these countries, So we cannot quantify the numbers reached. Information provided by Etheldreda Nakimuli Mpungu on 10 July 2024. She is the author.

Author: Etheldreda Nakimuli Mpungu